Free to take · optional one-time report
Two-Person Compatibility
36 questions each, answered separately. One joint report.
You and one other person answer the same questionnaire independently. The joint report compares six areas using a different, published rule for each — not a single similarity score — and says what to do with the differences it finds.
- Questions
- 36
- Time
- ~9 minutes
- Signup
- Not required
- Report
- Optional
Free, always
- All 36 questions, with no time limit
- An invitation link to send to one person
- The joint headline and which single area is strongest
- A clearly locked preview of the complete joint report
Complete report — optional, one-time
- All six areas, each with both scores and the rule used to compare them
- Where you are aligned and what that tends to make easy
- Where you differ, and whether that difference usually matters
- The specific conversation each difference is worth having
- What you both said you want from a partner, side by side
- Unlocked for both of you by one payment, whoever pays
A single one-time payment, priced on your result page. No subscription and no renewal.
Before you start
- Your individual answers are never shown to the other person. What you will both see is a score for each of six areas and the joint report.
- Answer for how you actually are. A report built on two flattering self-portraits is worth nothing to either of you.
- This compares stated preferences. It is educational and self-reflective, it is not a clinical or diagnostic instrument, and it is not couples therapy.
- It cannot tell you whether to be together, and it does not try. No score here is a verdict on a relationship.
- The invitation link expires. Anyone who has the link can answer, so send it to one person and only that person.
Your answers save as you go, so you can close this and come back later.
Start, then send one link
You answer first. When you finish you will get a private link to send to one person, and the joint report appears once they have answered too.
This is shown to the other person on the report. No account, no email address.
Methodology, limitations and validation status
What it measures. Six areas of a close relationship as each participant describes themselves: communication directness, conflict and repair behaviour, trust and reliability, ambition and the place of work, lifestyle and pace, and long-term priorities. It describes two self-reports, not a relationship.
Where the items come from. All 36 items were written for MindScore. Nothing is taken from a published or proprietary relationship inventory, and the comparison rules are our own.
How it is scored. Each participant answers independently and is scored exactly like any other MindScore questionnaire: normalised item values, reverse items mirrored, a 0-100 score per area. The two sets of area scores are then compared using a different rule per area, chosen in advance and printed in the report — a floor where both people need to clear a bar, a gap rule where the distance between two people is the cost, a tolerant similarity rule where a difference is negotiable, and a strict alignment rule where a large gap genuinely matters. It is deliberately not an average similarity score, because the areas do not work the same way.
Validation status. Not validated. No norming sample exists, no reliability statistics have been collected, and no relationship between these scores and any real-world outcome has been established or tested.
- This compares two self-reports. It has no access to how either of you actually behaves, and self-description in relationships is unreliable in both directions.
- A high score is not a prediction that a relationship will work, and a low one is not a prediction that it will not. Nothing here predicts anything.
- The comparison rules and their weights are our own judgement. They are written down and testable, and they have not been validated against any relationship outcome.
- Six areas is not a relationship. Attraction, history, circumstance, timing, children, health and money all matter enormously and none of them are measured here.
- It is not a clinical or diagnostic instrument, it is not couples therapy, and it is not a substitute for either.
- It cannot detect coercion, dishonesty or harm, and it must not be used to decide whether someone is safe to be with.
Assessment version 1 · scoring version 1